By Caroline Breashears. She is a Professor of English at St. Lawrence University. She gives some great examples of how storytelling illustrates economic ideas. It is fairly long but worth reading. Excerpt:
"From Adam Smith
to Ayn Rand, advocates of liberty have used stories to convey their
theories of economics and morality. In the eighteenth century, Smith
made his ideas lucid to contemporaries—starting with the university
students he was teaching—by interspersing his writings with literary
examples and brief narratives. The tale of the poor man’s son visited by
ambition is well-known to readers of The Theory of Moral Sentiments. In the twentieth century, Rand’s novelistic form made economic theory accessible to general readers, who saw in Atlas Shrugged the corruption and inefficiency of government directives such as Rand’s fictitious Directive No. 10-289.
The power of their stories as well as their theories has inspired
criticism. Advocates of equality write counter-narratives associating
proponents of free markets with villains from popular culture (such as
Gordon Gekko) who function as metonyms for corruption. A recent example
is Lisa Duggan’s Mean Girl: Ayn Rand and the Culture of Greed (2019). Duggan compares Rand to the “Plastics” in the cult film Mean Girls
(2004), where a clique of young women maintain their popularity in high
school through both fashion and cruelty. She details how Rand, “the
original mean girl,” supported “corrosive capitalism” by making
“acquisitive capitalists sexy.” Rand’s novels, the key to her influence,
“provide a structure of feeling—optimistic cruelty—that morphs
throughout the twentieth century and underwrites the form of capitalism
on steroids that dominates the present.” The results are “economic
exploitation and political domination.” (Duggan xi, xv, 5, 83)
Such narratives lack originality as well as accuracy, but those are
not their objectives. Duggan acknowledges that she is not writing
literary criticism or biography or social history (as we see in Jennifer
Burns’s Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand the American Right).
Instead, Duggan is producing something that “belongs to American
cultural studies, grasped through a global frame” and created “via
analysis and speculation” (Duggan xvii).
Using these strategies, Duggan shapes a familiar story that
affirms the cruelty of capitalism and promotes systems designed to
create equality. One reviewer notes that Duggan’s book is “an exercise
in emotional upheaval. One minute I was laughing out loud, the next
crying into my tea.” He adds, “It is a terrific book only partly about
Rand, because it is really an intellectual history of neoliberalism—and
its toxic outcomes.” Another writes with obvious relief, “Lisa Duggan
does a deep dive into Ayn Rand so that we don’t have to.”
Such readers ironically replicate the snobbery of the Plastics,
accepting Duggan’s disdain for Rand’s “middle-to-low brow aesthetic
preferences,” as if only those with bad taste could like Rachmaninoff
and free markets (Duggan 4).
How does one respond to such counter-stories?
How does one make the case for the free society when that ideal has been
distorted, its proponents reduced to high-school divas whose brutality
is simultaneously mocked and imitated?
Economics and Story-Telling
Here I offer one answer: a short narrative about what key advocates
of liberty really say, how their theories evolve, and why their stories
illustrating those theories resonate. I focus on Adam Smith and Ayn
Rand, two figures critical to what Nicholas Capaldi and Gordon Lloyd
call the “liberty narrative,” which runs parallel to and in conversation
with the “equality narrative” promoted by philosophers such as
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Karl Marx.
Rand’s and Smith’s interests in economics, morality, and aesthetics
render them a natural pairing. By examining how Smith and Rand
contribute to the debate over liberty vs. equality, we can see how
Duggan attempts to shut down conversation through smears rather than
facts.
These writers depicted the free society from the start of a period of
unprecedented prosperity in the late eighteenth century to a point when
liberty seemed under attack in the mid-twentieth century. Adam Smith,
often called the founding father of modern economics, wrote in the
latter half of the eighteenth century, at the start of the Industrial
Revolution. In his treatise An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), Smith examines how and why nations gain wealth, and the role of government and businessmen in furthering or hindering that growth. There and in The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1790), he often includes brief narratives illustrating his ideas."
No comments:
Post a Comment